chock_coal_ate_bawks ([personal profile] chock_coal_ate_bawks) wrote in [community profile] yuletide_coal2018-01-29 09:52 am

The rest of the exchange year...

...is worth wanking over, too.

Discuss Chocolate Box, Age Gap Exchange, Unusual Bearings, etc.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
It took two days for them to even get the comment coordination document up, after a nonny who wasn't involved in the collective pointed it out.

TBH, I'm not convinced they ever were going to comment if the thing hadn't blossomed into wank just after author reveals.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

The nonnies who participated certainly didn't seem very interested in...well, basically any aspect of the exchange, really.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-21 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt I had the feeling that a lot of the ones who were involved hadn't done exchanges on their own previously, since there were comments about "easing into doing exchanges" by doing this.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
That is some A+ reasoning there. Wow.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
SA I mean, on the part of the noobs jumping into an exchange like this and thinking it would be easier. Not you, coalie.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
I thought they meant they were newbs to collective work, not exchange newbs.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Totally possible. I thought I remembered someone saying they'd be more comfortable signing up as a group to their first exchange, but I'm not finding that on dememe, so I may have conflated another comment or comments.

Re: Chocolate Box winners, losers, wank?

(Anonymous) 2018-02-22 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Nice lmao