heavensqueen: (Default)
heavensqueen ([personal profile] heavensqueen) wrote in [community profile] yuletide_coal2014-10-18 02:28 am

The Dirty Energy Source

Do you want to make a spreadsheet about spreadsheets?
Do you still need to figure out what two other fandoms you should request beside the only one you really want fic for?
Or are you trolling ALL the letter posts for placeholders, just so you can write those people some nice, dry coal?

We want to know all about it.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
DA

'Drabbles with no plot' could have been worded better and with more clarity, but that's a somewhat legitimate DNW. Reading that, I think they want 1000 words of a single story, not five separate 200-word vignettes that stop before any one of them goes anywhere interesting.

Okay, but why would you need to specify that? Who would want five separate 200-word vignettes that stop before any of them goes anywhere interesting? Wouldn't that be against the rules anyway?

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
I could definitely see someone writing that and calling it a five things fic.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, but that's like saying "no OOC" or "no badfic". Most people don't set out to write bad, disconnected 5 times fic, just like most people don't set out to write bad long, plotty fic.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
OAA, maybe just don't offer their fandoms.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
...huh?

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
What?

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
DA

"[Overly Agressive Anon], maybe [stop debating over this letter and] just don't offer their fandoms."

There fixed it for you newbs.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
I got that part, I just have no idea why they think the comment they replied to is aggressive. Am I too jaded for anon meme?

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
Fixed to be legible, you mean. I also know what OAA means, but had no idea what that sentence was supposed to say in relation to the thread at hand. I still don't know why you or the person above think that comment was aggressive, though.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
DA

I'd be okay with that, since I quite like 5-times character studies and/or introspective pieces.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
One of the loveliest pieces I've ever received in an exchange was a set of four thematically connected 250-word pieces for four different fandoms I'd requested.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
It's possible to make that kind of fic work, but but not everyone likes that. And even fewer people are capable of executing it.

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
That's pretty different than what this person is saying, then. What they're saying is the equivalent of "dislikes: bad fic."

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
"drabbles with no plot" are not necessarily badfic. AIRT said, "Who would want five separate 200-word vignettes that stop before any of them goes anywhere interesting?" and my answer, like the answer of the anon above me, is, "Me."

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
You would want a story that stops before it goes anywhere interesting?

Re: Bad Letters

(Anonymous) 2014-10-19 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
For values of "interesting."