heavensqueen: (Default)
heavensqueen ([personal profile] heavensqueen) wrote in [community profile] yuletide_coal2014-10-18 02:28 am

The Dirty Energy Source

Do you want to make a spreadsheet about spreadsheets?
Do you still need to figure out what two other fandoms you should request beside the only one you really want fic for?
Or are you trolling ALL the letter posts for placeholders, just so you can write those people some nice, dry coal?

We want to know all about it.

Re: People You'd Default On

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
http://merry-smutmas.livejournal.com/136807.html

coffeejunkii or whatever is their friend as well, comments from both them and wook77 are awful

Re: People You'd Default On

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
Lord, she is a piece of work, sending her minions in to start the trash-talking for her.

Though she certainly does seem to inspire some...experimental fic. At some point she's got to look at her won prompts and wonder what she's doing to inspire them. Or, well, she doesn't, but she should.

Re: People You'd Default On

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
"We both have our own interpretations of words, don't we?"

I'm not reading anything else, because that wank is 7 years old, but that was a great line lmao

Re: People You'd Default On

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
DA

The Yuletide fic is a better example of wook's wankiness, imo. The writer here outright says in their meta post that they ignored wook's prompts and likes/dislikes. While wook could have been more gracious, this fic is really ... out there ... as a response to the prompts.

If I asked for Harry Potter smut and I got clones with paper-thin worldbuilding, no canonical inspiration that I can see, and characterization that didn't resemble the characters I read at all, I wouldn't comment.

Re: People You'd Default On

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I can only extrapolate the prompt from the author's comments in their meta post, but this fic seems to be Untherius levels of not-what-recip-requested. The recip wanted Harry/Draco, canon characterization, and voyeurism, and the writer gave them clone!Harry, clone!Draco, no romance that I can see, and barely even enough sex to justify the NC-17 rating they gave it? 'Cuz, dude.

Re: People You'd Default On

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
DA

Yeah, it just seems to me that wook has been saddled multiple times with authors who did not want to follow her prompts and didn't really take it lying down. Maybe she's not the most pleasant person and she definitely doesn't fit into the Cult of Nice, but I think any author who actually tries to write her requests probably doesn't have anything to worry about?