heavensqueen: (Default)
heavensqueen ([personal profile] heavensqueen) wrote in [community profile] yuletide_coal2015-10-25 01:22 am

It's a Coal (w)rap Battle

Sign-up or edit your offers/requests till October 27

Writing Post : http://yuletide-coal.dreamwidth.org/4047.html

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
http://starry-wolf.livejournal.com/8147.html

3 of 5 of the Maze Runner (Movie) prompts are for book canon. Like, post-end-of-book stories, but with no mention that that's what she's referencing (perhaps because she knows it's sketchy, perhaps because she can't imagine anyone offering this w/out knowledge of the books?). And I'm sure a lot of people have read the books, but there have to be people who will not understand what she's getting at and also, it's definitely not the canon requested.

One of the remaining 2 prompts, by the way, is a prompt for a Teen Wolf cross-over, so I guess she's just not into the spirit of a rare fandom challenge all around.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Are those quotes from the books? I hate prompts like this where they give you a disembodied quote but don't explain what it means to them, it leaves too much room for a major difference in interpretation.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
they're not book quotes. I think they're dialogue snippets she wrote as prompts, but they 100% align with the book ending and have no corresponding context in the movies, since they reference things the movies dropped from the books and/or haven't gotten to the end yet.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I've seen people use them as part of fandom headers, like a moment from fandom they like. I get a kick out of that, but to just use them as a prompt alone is just...odd.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't she also the one who wanted five million fandoms on the Crueltide post? And asks for fandoms where she doesn't actually know that version of the canon?

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
AND complains about being a late pinch hit?

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
And wants to write treats for prompts where she "doesn't know the canon"?

Yep.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
oh wow. and she justifies it by saying she's trying to be fair to her author which doesn't match up with this request issue. what a delight.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, at Crueltide she mentioned "no explicit sex involving females", a commenter mentioned that that wasn't in her letter, she said she'd edit it in right away, and it's still not in there
http://yuletide.livejournal.com/1239458.html?thread=20813730#t20813730

It's also not in her massive fic exchange masterpost, but she does have this baffling list in her masterpost:

Things most people hate but I don't mind:

  • Rape, especially if canon, as long as it's not Character A of my ship raping B
  • Graphic descriptions of violence/death
  • Obviously, please no gratuitous rape or violence.


??? what??

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Does she cut and paste letters template letters and not read clearly or something?

Or does she mean she likes it if it's canon typical but not... gratuitously additional rape and violence...

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Coal must be bored if we revisiting this again.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know about you, but I'm bored. This isn't helping fix it.

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I missed it last time. :(

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Rape by tru wuv is a okay uwu

Re: Letter judging post again

(Anonymous) 2015-10-27 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
no, they're saying that they DON'T want rape by tru wuv. just other rape.

but not if it's gratuitous, apparently. though it can be graphic. (what?)